reviewsnsa.blogg.se - Dhavalkumar sunderkand full

CPIO, National Mission for Manuscripts, New Delhi, and CPIOs of 4 other organisations – The CIC directed the NMM to put in public domain the around 3 lakhs manuscripts (according to the respondent) which it has digitized so far within a period of one year from the date of receipt of this order.

CIC Decision dated on the Second Appeal filed by Mr.

xxx xxx Further, the Commission observes that if the technical vendor is not cooperating with the CPIO, the controlling authority should take an appropriate view on competence performance of the vendor. That the conduct of the concerned FAA is also found to be lacking as the first appeal has not been disposed off meticulously, therefore the FAA’s conduct should also be examined by its controlling authority.ĩ. He is being reprimanded for future as the information that could have been provided on time, also not provided by the concerned CPIO. That the conduct of the concerned CPIO is highly objectionable and same should be brought to the notice of his controlling authority for an appropriate view.

In view of the above, the Commission hereby issues strict warning to the concerned CPIO for not providing the available information for so long. Both the parties submitted their written submissions and the same were taken on record.ĬIC: “8. The respondent, Shri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, CPIO/ Regional Manager attended the hearing through audio-call.

CPIO, State Bank of India, Siliguri, Darjeeling, West Bengal– The appellant attended the hearing through audio-call. CIC Order dated on the Second Appeal filed by Mr.Nonetheless, the US & then CPIO was directed by the Commission to send his written explanation stating as to why no effort was invested by him in locating the averred complaint despite being provided with the reference of the relevant CVC’s forwarding note. CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi– The CIC decided that it (the facts of the case) reflected on the then CPIO’s gross non-application of mind and a lackadaisical approach in executing the statutory duty cast upon him by virtue of the RTI Act. CIC Decision dated on the Second Appeal/Complaint filed by Sh.In this regard, the CPIO was advised to follow due process of law as envisaged under the RTI Act before parting with any information which stands exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act. 1 of RTI Application to the Appellant without seeking consent of said employees under Section 11 of RTI Act. of Post Office, Bhuswal, Maharashtra – The CIC, inter alia, observed that the CPIO has erred in providing the caste related information of all the employees in response to point no.